The Ambiguity Aversion Literature: A Critical Assessment∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
We provide a critical assessment of the ambiguity aversion literature, which we characterize in terms of the view that Ellsberg choices are rational responses to ambiguity, to be explained by relaxing Savage’s sure thing principle and adding an ambiguity-aversion postulate. First, admitting Ellsberg choices as rational leads to behavior, such as sensitivity to irrelevant sunk cost, or aversion to information, which most economists would consider absurd or irrational. Second, we argue that the mathematical objects referred to as ‘beliefs’ in the ambiguity aversion literature have little to do with how an economist or game theorist understands and uses the concept. This is because of the lack of a useful notion of updating. Third, the anomaly of the Ellsberg choices can be explained simply and without tampering with the foundations of choice theory. These choices can arise when decision makers form heuristics that serve them well in real-life situations where odds are manipulable, and misapply them to experimental settings. ∗ We are grateful to Drew Fudenberg, Edi Karni, Bart Lipman, Marciano Siniscalchi, Costis Skiadas, and Rakesh Vohra for detailed comments that substantially improved the paper. We also thank Luciano de Castro, Eddie Dekel, Daniel Gottlieb, Faruk Gul, Yoram Halevy, Peter Klibanoff, Stephen Morris, Sujoy Mukerji, Emre Ozdenoren, seminar participants at LSE, NYU, Penn, UCL and Washington for helpful conversations, and Aygun Dalkiran, Mallesh Pai, and Pablo Schenone for excellent research assistance. † Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston IL 60208. e-mail: [email protected]. Research page : http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/alnajjar/htm/index.htm ‡ Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston IL 60208. e-mail: [email protected] Research page : http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/weinstein/htm/index.htm
منابع مشابه
Two out of three ain’t bad:∗ a comment on “The ambiguity aversion literature: A critical assessment”
Al-Najjar and Weinstein 2009 propose to scrutinize the implications of recent theories of ambiguity in dynamic settings. They conclude that such implications are so unreasonable as to cast doubts on the legitimacy of the theories under consideration. The present paper argues that the seemingly unreasonable implications highlighted by Al-Najjar and Weinstein can be understood as the result of ba...
متن کاملThe Subjective Approach to Ambiguity: A Critical Assessment∗
We provide a critical assessment of the (subjective) ambiguity literature, which we characterize in terms of the view that Ellsberg choices are rational responses to ambiguity, to be explained by relaxing Savage’s sure thing principle and adding an ambiguity-aversion postulate. First, admitting Ellsberg choices as rational leads to behavior, such as sensitivity to irrelevant sunk cost, or avers...
متن کاملEarnings Announcement Premium and Information Ambiguity
In today's investment world there is emphasis on the role of accounting information. Behavioral factors always play an important role in financial markets. All investors are not rational and their demand for riskiness of assets is influenced by their beliefs and feelings. Optimism, pessimism, self-confidence, ambiguity-aversion, etc. help changing the manner of decision-making process over time...
متن کاملAmbiguity Paolo
In this entry for the Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance I briefly review the decisiontheoretic literature on ambiguity, and discuss the consequences of ambiguity (and ambiguity aversion) for financial decision making.
متن کاملAmbiguity Aversion in Competitive Insurance Markets: Adverse and Advantageous Selection
We analyze an extension of the Rothschild-Stiglitz model with ambiguous loss probabilities and ambiguity-averse consumers to determine whether there are adverse or advantageous selection equilibria. We show that non-increasing absolute ambiguity aversion is sufficient for adverse selection. We show generally that actuarially fair pricing is also sufficient for adverse selection and that advanta...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009